Guidelines of argumentation for the use in persuasive essays

Guidelines of argumentation for the use in persuasive essays

If you’d like to compose a great persuasive essay, you should employ sufficient arguments and use them precisely. Arguments must persuade your reader while making him alter their mind or point of view.

What are the most rudimentary rules of giving arguments?

  1. 1. Run with simple, clear, precise and convincing concepts, as persuasiveness can easily be “drowned” in a sea of words and arguments, particularly if they’re ambiguous and inaccurate; the interlocutor “hears” or understands a lot less than he desires to show.
  2. 2. The manner and speed regarding the argument should match towards the temperament regarding the author:
  • arguments and evidence, explained separately, are much more beneficial in reaching the objective than if they’re presented all at once;
  • three to four bright arguments achieve a better effect than numerous meaningless arguments;
  • argumentation must not be declarative or seem like a monologue for the “protagonist”;
  • appropriate pauses often exert a better impact compared to flow of words;
  • the interlocutor is better influenced by the active construction of this expression compared to the passive with regards to evidence (for instance, it is better to say “we are going to do so” than “can be carried out).
  1. 3. The thinking must be correct according to the audience. This means:
  • always openly admit rightness for the opinion that is opposite it is right, even in the event it can have unfavorable consequences for you personally. Thus giving your interlocutor the chance to expect the same behavior from the opposing side. In addition, by doing so, that you do not break the ethics;
  • it is best to try using only those arguments that will be accepted by the audience. Make an effort to read him mind beforehand and speak the same language;
  • avoid empty phrases, they suggest a weakening of attention and result in unnecessary pauses to be able to gain time and get the lost thread associated with conversation (as an example, “as ended up being said,” or “in other words,” “more or less,” “along with all the noticeable”, “It is achievable and so, and so”, “it had not been said”, etc.).

Whenever arguments that are giving perform some after

It is necessary to adjust arguments into the individual associated with reader, ie:

  • build arguments on the basis of the objectives and motives regarding the interlocutor;
  • keep in mind that “excessive” persuasiveness provokes rebuff from the subordinate, especially if he’s got an “aggressive” nature (the “boomerang” effect);
  • avoid expressions that are nondeval formulations which make it hard to argue and comprehend;
  • you will need to present towards the worker whenever possible the data, a few ideas and considerations.

Keep in mind the proverb: “It is far better to see once than hear one hundred times.” Bringing comparisons that are vivid artistic arguments, you should understand that evaluations ought to be on the basis of the connection with the reader, otherwise you will have no result, they have to support and fortify the author’s argumentation, be convincing, but without exaggeration and extremes that can cause the mistrust for the performer and thereby put under question all of the parallels. & Most notably, you have to respect the reader and stay truthful with him.